<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>BloggerSavvy &#187; sphinn</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bloggersavvy.com/tag/sphinn/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bloggersavvy.com</link>
	<description>BloggerSavvy is about learning how to grow your blog or website. BloggerSavvy is about making blogs and websites (in   general), profitable. It’s about finding and using the best tools; and advice to obtain the best exposure for your online   presence. How to market and monetize your blog and web site.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 14:52:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Common Blog Traffic Sources?</title>
		<link>http://bloggersavvy.com/common-blog-traffic-sources/</link>
		<comments>http://bloggersavvy.com/common-blog-traffic-sources/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 17:23:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>BloggerSavvy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blog Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[community]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[delicious]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reddit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sphinn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[statistics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stumbleupon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[traffic]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bloggersavvy.com/?p=126</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I had an interesting discussion about blog and web site traffic sources with a colleague of mine over the weekend. He was looking at the changing landscape of web traffic, especially how his blogs were outperforming his &#8220;traditional&#8221; web sites. He alluded to an earlier post of mine &#8220;Why Blogs May Be Better Than Traditional [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had an interesting discussion about blog and web site <strong>traffic sources</strong> with a colleague of mine over the weekend. He was looking at the changing landscape of web traffic, especially how his <strong>blogs were outperforming</strong> his &#8220;traditional&#8221; web sites. He alluded to an earlier post of mine &#8220;<a title="Why Blogs May Be Better Than Traditional Sites" href="http://bloggersavvy.com/why-blogs-may-be-better-than-traditional-web-sites/" target="_self">Why Blogs May Be Better Than Traditional Sites</a>&#8220;, and suggested that the changing face of how data is accessed, shared, exchanged, mashed up, etc. should also be reflected in the web statistics of blog owners. He suggested (among other things) that traditional linking, wherein you ask a site owner to exchange links is an antiquated method that simply does not hold true in today&#8217;s changing webscape. I disagreed until he suggested I take a look at the number of social web sites that are driving traffic to any one of my blogs.<img src="http://bloggersavvy.com/wp-content/uploads/spacer.gif" alt="" width="1" height="1" /></p>
<p>I chose my Linux (Ubuntu) based blog, selecting the <strong>statistics for a full year</strong> (July 17, 2007 to July 17, 2008 &#8211; Since it I didn&#8217;t start promoting it until July) and was rather surprised by a couple things. I assumed that Google would still be the prime traffic source. I also assumed that all the links from other (non-blog, &#8220;traditional&#8221; sites) sites would rank high. I was surprised in both cases. I personally found it interesting to note that you get a good statistical perspective on a day-to-day basis, but you&#8217;ll get a <strong>more accurate view</strong> if you stand back and look at the big picture <strong>over a longer time period</strong>. Here are the results below:<img src="http://bloggersavvy.com/wp-content/uploads/spacer.gif" alt="" width="1" height="1" /></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="size-medium wp-image-127 aligncenter" title="Blog Traffic" src="http://bloggersavvy.com/wp-content/uploads/jul07-jul08-300x300.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="300" /></p>
<p><img src="http://bloggersavvy.com/wp-content/uploads/spacer.gif" alt="" width="1" height="1" /></p>
<p>As you can see above, <strong>Social Media sites took the lead</strong> (just a tich ahead of Google). I also found it significant that inbound <strong>traffic from other blogs</strong> had a clear lead over inbound traffic from &#8220;traditional&#8221; (static) web sites. Equally surprising was how I saw that <strong>Google outperformed</strong> inbound search engine traffic by a massive lead.<img src="http://bloggersavvy.com/wp-content/uploads/spacer.gif" alt="" width="1" height="1" /></p>
<p>The specific driving force within the Social Media (36.41% traffic), without question was <strong>StumbleUpon</strong>, which championed a massive lead of social media based traffic at 85.56%. Just look at the Social Media results breakdown below:</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="size-medium wp-image-128 aligncenter" title="Blog Traffic Social Media Sites" src="http://bloggersavvy.com/wp-content/uploads/bar-chart-300x300.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="300" /></p>
<p><img src="http://bloggersavvy.com/wp-content/uploads/spacer.gif" alt="" width="1" height="1" /></p>
<p>One thing I found interesting to note is some users of StumbleUpon <strong>shared some of the post links</strong> they saw in Reddit and Digg. So&#8230; while some posts that went viral, Digg and Reddit produced traffic spikes, they were only significant for a short time period. Instead, social media sites  (primarily StumbleUpon) saved those &#8220;traffic spiked&#8221; posts and subsequently that blog enjoyed <strong>long term</strong>, year round <strong>traffic</strong>.<img src="http://bloggersavvy.com/wp-content/uploads/spacer.gif" alt="" width="1" height="1" /></p>
<p>What did I learn from our discussion and an examination of the blog statistics? Among several things, below are some of the points that were more predominant.<img src="http://bloggersavvy.com/wp-content/uploads/spacer.gif" alt="" width="1" height="1" /></p>
<ul>
<li>There&#8217;s a lot of discussion about to benefits or lack thereof, with regards to using sites that can provide instant massive traffic volume (such as Digg). While sites such as Digg may provide <strong>short term spikes</strong> (for the average blog). Visitors to sites such can and will share your post link with others. As such, don&#8217;t discount the power of sites such as Digg. Short term effect, but a <strong>long term social effect</strong>.<img src="http://bloggersavvy.com/wp-content/uploads/spacer.gif" alt="" width="1" height="1" /></li>
<li>Google still loves me. Humour aside, SEO or the lack thereof can have a large effect on traffic form search engines &#8211; I think we know that. More to the point however, I noticed that the posts that are <strong>heavily shared on social sites</strong> have a much <strong>higher page rank</strong> than those which don&#8217;t, appearing higher in search results. It seems to me therefore, to continue providing quality content that is of value to the &#8220;community&#8221;.<img src="http://bloggersavvy.com/wp-content/uploads/spacer.gif" alt="" width="1" height="1" /></li>
<li>Continue to participate in blogging and other dynamic platforms. Convert the remainder of my old-fashioned static site to dynamic packages (blogging, CMS, etc.)  Why? When you post a blog, it <strong>pings site update services</strong> (such as pingomatic). Static (&#8220;traditional&#8221;) sites don&#8217;t do that. Each time a post is published RSS <strong>readers obtain the updates, automatically</strong>. These are things that help drive repeat visits (subscribers). Many of which might be adding your posts to various social sites.<img src="http://bloggersavvy.com/wp-content/uploads/spacer.gif" alt="" width="1" height="1" /></li>
</ul>
<p>While I&#8217;m fairly sure many blog sites may follow the general pattern I&#8217;ve seen with my traffic sources. I don&#8217;t think they will all follow the pattern established in the social media site rankings. This is mainly an issue of blog character, readership, blogsphere area and so forth. Not all blogs are in the same neighbourhood and have the same types of readers. For example a blog that focuses on internet marketing, I would assume might have more traffic from <a title="Sphinn" href="http://sphinn.com/" target="_blank">Sphinn</a>, for example.<img src="http://bloggersavvy.com/wp-content/uploads/spacer.gif" alt="" width="1" height="1" /></p>
<p>All too often, I find business owners (and site owners) oblivious to the power that dynamic sites can bring them, and how they are better able to make use of social media sites. In other cases, business owners simply don&#8217;t believe what they are being told as they appear not to have a good grasp of how the Internet really works and how their potential market really uses it.  My previous post &#8220;<a title="Why Every Business Can Benefit Form a Blog" href="http://bloggersavvy.com/why-every-business-can-benefit-from-a-blog/" target="_self">Why Every Business Can Benefit Form a Blog</a>&#8221; for example, shows that a UK survey indicates &#8220;&#8230;66% of businesses believe that blogs are becoming more influential as an information source&#8230;&#8221; While this number is UK based, I assume it may be similar in other geographic regions and , more importantly, will to grow!<img src="http://bloggersavvy.com/wp-content/uploads/spacer.gif" alt="" width="1" height="1" /></p>
<p>It will be interesting to see how the trends change over time. Perhaps one of the upcomming issues that search engines will need to address even further than they are now, is the inherent appeal of sites (such as blogs) that are better equipped to address the needs of site visitors. What new tools will be available to blogs desiring visibility in a growing webscape? As the video in my prior post (link at the top) suggested, we&#8217;ll need to rethink ourselves.<img src="http://bloggersavvy.com/wp-content/uploads/spacer.gif" alt="" width="1" height="1" /></p>
<img src="http://bloggersavvy.com/31d7910a/266bb3d2/CCBot/1.0 (+http://www.commoncrawl.org/bot.html).gif" /><hr /><small>Copyright &copy; 2009 BloggerSavvy Enterprises Inc. All Rights Reserved.<br /> This feed is for personal reading, non-commercial use only. <br /> The use of this feed on other web sites breaches copyright. Please visit <a href="http://bloggersavvy.com/common-blog-traffic-sources/" title="BloggerSavvy"> BloggerSavvy</a> to read the original content.<br />(Digital Fingerprint:  039e595x4620d9aufgvf3rt1skqzybh6 (38.107.179.210) )</small>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bloggersavvy.com/common-blog-traffic-sources/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

